Terrorists Attack: a Media Analysis :: essays research papers

Terrorists AttackFebruary 26, 1993, the day that terrorists made the biggest attack on American soil to that point. It was early afternoon on a Friday, 1218 pm to be exact, a car bomb ripped by dint of the guts of the now infamous North World Trade summation twin tower. It happened very quickly, and without warning, normal people were simply going well-nigh their daily business, when all of a sudden, the building shook, the power went out, and smoke began to filling all 110 floors of the towers. Many wondered what had happened, had a plane struck the building, was it an seism? D, n maven of the above, few crazed maniac had decided to kill 5 people and injure many more just to get some point across.This event graced the front page of newspapers and news magazines across the country, the natural York Times was the newspaper closest to the action. Covrage in this newspaper was published one day after the event, and coverednot only the event but the ensuing occupation chaos it caus ed. Being a newspaper local to New York City, the set of the attack, the newpaper catered to the interests of its local readers. The New York Times, however, is also circulated around the country, and around the world. This required the newpaper editors, publishers, and writers to run sensitive to the feelings and thoughts of readers in the broader reading audience.Newsweek Magazine also published insurance reportage of the attack. Their primary audience is a national one, and consequently, the coverage is geared toward a broader audience. Also, seeing as the magazine is only published once a week, earlier than daily as the New York Times, Newsweek had more time to converge facts and evidence. This added time for research leads more to a fact based coverage than a question based coverage.One interesting observation is that it seems both sources immediately assume that foreign terrorists were the primary perpetrators of this attack. Neither article comes near out and says it, h owever both are rather ambiguous or so it. Newsweek does mention the possibility of a domestic source for the violence, but spends practically more time and effort explaining the possible foreign sources. Overall both articles seem rather straightforward in their representation of the event, and remain rather simplistic, so as not to confuse the reading audience.When an event of this magnitude occurs, emotions are bound to play a role in the coverage.