Aristotle and Plato Essay

One of the greatest philosophers of all date was a man named Aristotle, the superannuated greek philosopher. He was practically influenced every ara of conceptual new-fangled thinking. His mind set was in terms of materialism, which he inherently viewed inwardness on Earth before ideas and qualities. He in truth believed in the imprint of analyzing compounds and characteristics of population and their actions. Aristotle, who was a student of Plato, believed in fairness of character and survey, which direction that truth results from teaching, implement, and habits rather than Platos idealism whimseys of ideas and qualities (pg.265-266).He believed that peoples impressive actions would hunt down to virtue and that all things in tone had an end. That all ends must result in something good, an example would be an acorn, the end of an acorn would be an acorn tree. Aristotle believed that it was fateful for benignants to obtain happiness over a course of time and that this was the end for a human being. He believed that in launch to be inoffensive, one must first avoid somberness and deficiency. Aristotle also claims that legal expert can mean both lawfulness and fairness or prejudice can mean unlawfulness and unfairness.His nonion was that the law encouraged people to dog virtue, therefore, the lawful person would result to being virtuous. In essence, he claims that people who postdate virtue volition be just and those who do not pursue virtue will be unjust. He believed that sensory perceptions in the human soul are reflections of objects, and thoughts in consciousness are establish on what we have already passn. Plato believed that the average person could not see the truth, therefore, the noble lie was essential to get people to pursue their subjective form or task.A simple ascetic city with the imagination of everyone having natural abilities to do a certain job was justness for Plato. In contrast, Aristotle, did not believe th at humans had access to these perfect forms in their minds as a commission to reach justice and the perfect city. He argues that justice is a complete virtue when exercising virtue in likeness to others and that it requires intellectual virtue. That a virtuous person should pursue the most loving and happy behavior, which is the philosophical life of contemplation and speculation.The highest good for Aristotle is the end of a human, which is gained through virtuous action over their course of a life time. In order to live a life of virtue tally to Aristotle, one must find the mean or good actions, which conclusion the mean is virtuous actions. By exercising virtue in transaction to others is a good thing that will lead to a virtuous happy life and this will inevitably lead to an end of a human being, which is happiness. He was not a hedonist, his highest good reflected on reason, virtue, and experience that gains practical wisdom and that people learn from mistakes.This notio n of a human gaining happiness by life sentence a virtuous life reflects on his notion of a content society. Aristotles perception of justice was confusable to Platos in the way that virtue related to both moderateness and courage, but in all other aspects they were completely in contrast. merit consisted of habits and making right choices for the soul to be just, according to Aristotle. Virtue of temperance and courage causes people to be in a good utter and to perform their functions well up (pg. 269).Therefore, in order to acquire justice in Aristotles perception, virtue would have to take place within the individuals state of character and reason for the whole in order to pursue virtue. Equality being about justice and exercising freedom was permissible according to Aristotle. He was really about diversity, but not a feminist, he clearly reduced the womens roles in society, which was modal(prenominal) due to an era of sexism. There where three forms of happiness accordi ng to Aristotle- a life of pleasure and enjoyment, a life of free and responsibility, and a life as a thinker and philosopher.He rejected the imbalance of these exposit and it was essential in human relationships. Therefore, finding the mean and his example of not to be cowardly or impulsive, but courageous. Aristotle believed in the mixture of constitutions, which performer that if you mix oligarchy and democracy, which would be essentially polity tote uping a large shopping mall class, then there can be more equality and justice among the citizens (pg. 403). He described democracy as a form of organisation that would overthrow the rich. Therefore, where the poor are predominant, there will be democracy.Hes implying that there is a better way modern way to conduct a government where the people are not practiced by a monarch or tyranny. This means that if you rely on one type of constitution, then it would inevitably lead to depravity by changing into a bad constitution. An example would be if monarchy was established, then it would lead to tyranny or aristocracy to oligarchy. Aristotles notion was that in order to have equality, then a mixture of constitutions was needed for justice. He he elaborates on constitutions, he is indicating the system of government that should be established.This relates to virtue because in order to be virtuous depravity must be impermissible and having a mixture of constitutions brings a balance to good. He advocates on having a massive middle class would be essential in order to have a balance of equality and fairness. He supports on having this large middle class because it will genuinely bring a balance in society and impact on administration according to Aristotle. The virtue of justice belongs to the city, a self-determination of what is just. He advocates on the art of acquisition that wealth should have a limit.He does not seem to like people who are upset with moneymaking. He show on that a democracy was essent ially the worse type of government just as a tyranny. If there is no large middle class, then democracy denounces to rule by the poor and Aristotle believed that it should be the rule of everyone or the many. Therefore, the mixture of democracy and oligarchy was essential to Aristotle for the sake of polity. Being a just person can lead to a life of virtue, which is acquired by noble actions and experience, in contrast with Platos ideology of perfect forms in the human mind being to abstract and delusional.However, Aristotles notion is to pursue a virtuous life by making right choices and skill from mistakes, which is very good because human beings are not perfect. Happiness would be considered the end of a human being and its acquired by virtue according to Aristotle and making choices on whether to be or not to be a just person. His perspective revolved around people living in communities or governmental communities and that politics was a characteristic for the well-being.He al so incorporated public education being the means of a community and through the development of practical wisdom because he treasured people to learn from their mistakes, stating that there is no perfect idea of a society. When an individual acquired happiness, which was the highest good over their course of life, it was done by move virtue and noble actions. Therefore, Aristotles theory involves a fair political view where there is a higher class, lower class, but more importantly, a massive middle class where everyone must participate in politics.In accordance to Aristotles and its success can be opinionated by the happiness of the citizens. Where each citizen has acquired the point of where they derive in embossment and are capable of distinguishing the means and the extremes and the good of society. He criticized Sparta on their consummate(a) culture and the citizen structure of a military society because he genuinely believed that it was not a content community. He did not lack tender-hearted values and he emphasized on how people should exercise virtue in relations to others. In essence, Aristotles theory offers a well established broad and fair view of a justice for a society and politics.