'Minor Parties\r'

' encounter of Minor Parties In this paper, I will be addressing the allude of peanut parties. Minor parties are governmental parties who pass on little to no meeting on elections due to the amount of supporters and/or money is swan into the political party. However, in the get together States, venial parties well-nigh sequences come a huge impact on authorities and elections, whether it’s just getting their word come knocked out(p) of the closet in that location and the major parties actually bear in mind and discuss their issues, or they squeeze out even change which major party wins the election. Whatever the case may be, it shows that minor parties are just as effective as the major parties, although they leave never come out on top.Just because they are minor, does not mean they have no say or no impact in government. They are just as Copernican as the major parties, and they should ever be interpreted into consideration during election time. In my opinion, I have in mind minor parties are great for this country. They necessitate in different views and ideas, and I like to hear what around of them have to say. The United States is a free country, and in the first amendment of the Constitution, it allows us the right of free speech. This marrow anyone can express their thoughts and views on just most anything, and the minor parties do just that.They have gotten a say in politics, and the major parties sometimes bring the minor parties’ issues into discussion because they agree that their issue is a serious problem, and it needs to be fixed. I find it’s good that we don’t always have to hear the same boring halt somewhat issues we already know about. correct though they may never win a presidential election, at least there is some party out there that understands the issues that the major parties nor the majority of the United States citizens never really thought about.There has been a enormous history of minor party candidates ladder for chair, showtime with the Anti-Masonic party led by William Whit in 1832, and ending with the Reformist Party led by Ross Perot in 1996. There have even been truly successful minor parties. Some examples are Theodore Roosevelt’s Bull Moose Party in 1912, fanny Breckenridge’s Southern Democrat Party in 1860, and the most successful and recent one of our time Ross Perot’s Independent Party in 1992. exclusively of these parties I mentioned made an impact on their prize elections, and because of them, they brought in new ideas and have shaped our actual government.In this paragraph, I am going to discuss the 1992 election, and how a minor party greatly effected this election. In 1992, the Independent Party led by Ross Perot was running up against George W. bush older of the republican Party and Bill Clinton of the Democratic Party. Perot was a member of the Republican Party prior to the election, more thanover b ecause of his disagreements with twain of the parties’ issues, he decided to run as an independent. Bush Sr. was the current President, and was a shoe in for this election, but because of Perot’s switching of parties and how vocal he was, Bush lost supporters, while Perot gained a lot.Because of this, Clinton won with scarce 43% of the popular vote, while Bush had about 37%, and Perot had about 20%. This was one of the just times a President was elected into representation without the majority vote. This became the turning point on how the community viewed minor parties, and ever since, the government has started to listen to their views more often. There are even two independents in the Senate right now, taking the impact of minor parties other step further. With these minor parties there are supporters of them and there are concourse who are against them.The supporters of minor parties in the United States are obviously the minor parties themselves and the peo ple who support them because they want a say in politics so the current government can discuss them, and possibly change things around a little to their benefit if necessary. Another supporter would be the major party who got into office in an election because of the minor parties because if it weren’t for the minor parties and their popularity at the time, the major party’s candidate may have not gotten into office.The people who oppose them would probably be the major parties who lose an election due to the minor parties because the minor parties screwed them over from winning a presidential election. For example, the Republican Party was more than likely actually angry at Perot for not only release their party, but also costing them the 1992 election. The Democrats were obviously genuinely happy because if it weren’t for Perot, Clinton would have never been President that year. In conclusion, minor parties are great for our country. Even though they never win, they still have an impact on politics and sometimes the elections.The only resource I would suggest would be for the major parties to listen more to the minor parties because as of right now, postal code good is being done for this country to be turned around. There is a great make love of partisanship in the government right now, and no one is willing to work with one other because they are only concerned with their views and their party’s views, without taking others’ views into consideration. A minor party may have a good idea that both parties like, and it may be able to bring some bipartisanship back in the government and even attention our economy a little bit.There is nothing wrong with minor parties in this country, and I hope the major parties listen to more of their ideas in the future. Works Cited Leip, David. â€Å"1992 presidential General Election Results. ” US Selection Atlas. N. p. , n. d. Web. 18 Mar. 2013. Lightman, Max. â€Å"The Ro le of Minor Parties in Politics. ” Slideshare. N. p. , 30 Apr. 2008. Web. 18 Mar. 2013. Salka, William M. â€Å"The Impact of Minor Parties on Electoral argument: An Examination of US. ” N. p. , n. d. Web. 18 Mar. 2013.\r\n'