'Logic Cannot Prove the Existence of God Essay\r'

'For Anselm, victimisation logic that can be deducted intimately graven image, it is clear to see that deity’s being is necessary. In the second ontological argument from Anselm, immortal is the greatest world possible; it is greater to exist by necessity than by contingence, it is therefore, impossible for perfection to non exist. In this argument, God’s cosmos is an analytic statement, it is impossible to stand up that God exists and although Anselm believes that it does not contain to be evidencen, there is no federal agency of sagacious that it is analytic.\r\nFor example take trilaterals, every triplicity that anyone can ever call of bequeath have 3 sides that all chip in up to 180 degrees, that is simply a fall in of what a triangle is. adult male can however, prove this by picture every possible triangle and interrogatory them to see, with God’s existence that is not possible. For humans to consider his existence as an analytic state ment, they would have to go doctrine and logic alone.\r\nIn a way God’s existence could be a synthetic statement, which would mean that it would need to proven before the statement was real or not, the reason for this is because whether God exists or not does not prove his existence in reality as Anselm suggests in his argument. Kant would agree with this as he reviews Anselm’s ontological argument by aphorism that God’s existence is not a predicate, existence may be a firearm of the concept of God, that it does not proof that God exists.\r\nDescarte would also agree with the statement, as in his ontological argument he sets out that God is a perfect being, a part of being perfect is existing, and therefore God must exist. Descarte also uses the idea of the triangle in his argument, he writes that even if we come back of triangles having four sides, the truth will not change; the triangle will sojourn to have 3 sides. For Descarte the triangle is God, he believes that God is immutable and will not change even if humans think he does not exist.\r\nDescarte would argue that logic can be used to prove the existence of God, he believes that God has instilled in humans an idea of God, which is that he is perfect, in this Descarte agrees with Anselm he then however, writes that we cannot talk of God unless he exists as a part of being God is existing. His argument, for Descarte, demonstrates God’s existence this argument is a priori and uses smooth logic, and so for him God’s existence is an analytic statement.\r\n'