Discussion Questions

Running head : NO ! NO ! NOIt s a No ! No ! NoName of the StudentUniversity /SchoolName of InstructorCourse /SubjectIt s a No ! No ! No sociable bail arranging has been commodious established by the governance to meet the inescapably of the heap for an insured life history . deflection from that the principal(prenominal) employment of the program is mandated by the human race Rights and Freedom to nonplus more than or little(prenominal) a beneficial life finished savings and former(a) related programs . This provides each individualistic a profound portion out protection over unforeseen and expected mint such(prenominal) as aging , invalidness joblessness and the like . by from that , it is the duty of the state and the national political relation to insure a dependable life to its populace (International friendly credential acquaintance , 2008A parvenu end has just been arisen afterwards the proclamation of chairman George W . Bush about the eff on the ratification in the privatization of the Social Security re principal(prenominal)s . He says that it is separate accordingly to invest the earnings of the the great unwashed to the stock grocery than world kept in the political science treasury (Smith ,H , 2001 . The realistic hit is that privatization is one among the key methods of the federal sate to append the stocks and the investments of the untaught . It is evident that there is a fluctuating serial in the stock rates of the field and among the federal governments agency of alter the stock market is to increment the investment bowlful a semi privatization of the fond guarantor . Another conundrum is the effrontery on the dough and reappearance if one has invested in the semi-privatized mixer shelter . Will it afford a senior high up profit or a low profit ? It was not really answered clearly by the federal government .

In this view only those who argon well-to-do have the gritrock to have insurance to the social security which beats the main goal of the program- to insure a stable financial right(a) of the massesLooking at the caricature of the privatization amendment gives a less opportunity for the people to have their savings . As I can receive more or less the semi-privatization proposed by the president testament later move to a full privatized social security system aiming as an income root to the government and not as a program of financial assurance to the masses . In effect only those who atomic number 18 well-off have the cognitive content to gain profit on the system . indeed , my sales booth to the issue is a No ! No ! No ! to semi-privatization of the Social Security SystemReferencesInternational Social Security connectedness (2008 . About Social Security ISSA : Promoting andDeveloping Social Security oecumenical . Retrieved fromhypertext transfer protocol /network .issa .int /aiss /s /About-social-securitySmith , H (October 2001 . What Would encounter if We Privatized Social Security . Human QuestNET avocation Network . Retrieved fromHYPERLINK http /findarticles .com /p /articles /mi_qa3861 /is_200109 /ai_n8960081 /pg_2 ?tag artBody c http /findarticles .com /p /articles /mi_qa3861 /is_200109 /ai_n8960081 /pg_2 tag artBody col1It s a No ! PAGE MERGEFORMAT 2...If you trust to channel a full essay, say it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper