Cassirer

I agree with Cassirer when he says that, myth, art, language and science appear as symbols; non in the sense of mere figures which refer to roughly given over reality by means of suggestion and every(prenominal)egorical . . . in the sense of forces each of which produces and posits a world of its own. (p. 8).

Cassirer believed that man beings were superior of all symbolizing animals. Our achievements, science, religion, arts, history, political thought, religion, language - they all are unique parts of our evolutionary process and sustain us to understand our experience and the world. He believes that these exemplary forms are not imitations, but organs of reality.

His symbolic forms both come through in the world as the evolving frames of human experience. He took the picky case of language, Cassirer finds that the question as to its genesis has proved a veritable monkey puzzle (pp. 23-31).

On the one hand, it has become open that an adequate account of the genesis of language cannot begin with the symbolic forms characteristic of theoretical cognition. Even the most basic tubercle between name and class term requires a genic account.



On the other hand, some explanations as bewilder been offered have been rooted in naive realism, in the notion that structure

                                                                                         

and compartmentalization and features of the world that need only be noticed and reflected in language. With the adoption of the critical standpoint, these explanations wither away.

I agree with this point Cassirer is making. I believe when Cassirer says that myth, art, language and science appear as symbols; not in the sense of mere figures which refer to some given reality by means of suggestion and allegorical . . . in the sense of forces each of which...

If you want to get a full moon essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper